💰 Money & Taxes

The 2026 Tax Cliff: The New Law That's Going to Hurt

📅 December 2025 ⏱️ 8 min read 💰 Money & Taxes

Here's a sentence that should make every serious Ohio bettor uncomfortable: starting January 1, 2026, you can break even on your betting and still owe taxes on money you never actually made.

That's not a typo. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), passed in mid-2025, includes a provision that caps gambling loss deductions at 90% of your winnings. For recreational bettors wagering a few hundred bucks a year, this barely registers. For anyone betting with real volume, it's a financial gut punch disguised in boring tax code.

Let's break down exactly what changed, who gets hit hardest, and what you can do about it.

What Actually Changed?

Under the old rules (pre-2026), if you itemized your deductions, you could deduct gambling losses up to 100% of your gambling winnings. The math was straightforward:

Old Rules (Through 2025)

Total Winnings $50,000
Total Losses $50,000
Net Taxable Gambling Income $0

Fair enough. You broke even, you owe nothing on your gambling. Makes sense.

Now here's the new math:

New Rules (Starting 2026)

Total Winnings $50,000
Total Losses $50,000
Maximum Deductible Losses (90%) $45,000
Taxable "Phantom Income" $5,000

You broke even in reality. But on paper, you owe taxes on $5,000 of income that only exists in the tax code. At a 22% federal bracket, that's $1,100 in taxes on money you never pocketed.

⚠️ The Bigger You Bet, The Worse It Gets

This isn't a flat fee—it scales with your volume. Someone with $100,000 in wins and $100,000 in losses now has $10,000 in phantom taxable income. At higher volumes, you're looking at thousands in taxes on break-even years.

Who Gets Hit?

The impact varies dramatically based on your betting profile:

Bettor Type Annual Volume Impact
Casual Bettor $500-2,000/year Minimal—probably doesn't itemize anyway
Regular Bettor $5,000-20,000/year Noticeable if you itemize and break even
Serious Bettor $50,000-100,000/year Significant—could owe $1,000+ on break-even years
Sharp/Pro $100,000+/year Severe—may need to restructure approach entirely

The "Phantom Income" Problem

This is the core issue: you're being taxed on income that doesn't exist in any practical sense. Financial planners are already calling it "phantom income" because you never saw it, never spent it, and never had it—but the IRS says you owe taxes on it anyway.

Here's a real-world scenario that's going to happen to Ohio bettors in 2026:

Real Scenario: The Break-Even Year

NFL Season Winnings $12,000
NFL Season Losses $14,000
March Madness Winnings $8,000
March Madness Losses $6,000
Total Winnings $20,000
Total Losses $20,000
Net Result $0 (broke even)
Taxable Phantom Income $2,000
Taxes Owed (22% bracket) $440

You ended the year exactly where you started—but you're writing a $440 check to the IRS. That's the new reality.

What This Means for Your Strategy

The 90% cap changes the math on whether betting at high volume makes sense. Here are the practical implications:

1. The "Winning" Threshold Just Got Higher

To actually come out ahead after taxes, you need to win more than you lose—not just break even. The old goal of "don't lose money" is now "win enough to cover the phantom income tax."

2. Tracking Matters More Than Ever

You absolutely must track every bet, every win, every loss. Without documentation, you can't prove your losses, and you'll be taxed on 100% of your winnings with zero deductions. That's catastrophically worse than the 90% cap.

💡 Start Tracking Now

Every Ohio sportsbook provides bet history exports. Download yours monthly. Use a spreadsheet or an app like Action Network to log everything. Come April 2027, you'll thank yourself.

3. Volume Reduction Might Make Sense

For some bettors, the smart play might be reducing volume. If you're betting for entertainment and typically break even, you're now paying a tax for that entertainment. At some point, the math might not justify the action.

4. Winning Bettors Pay More Too

Even if you're profitable, the 90% cap still bites. Say you win $30,000 and lose $20,000—you're actually up $10,000. Under old rules, you'd be taxed on $10,000. Under new rules, you can only deduct $27,000 (90% of $30,000) against your $30,000 in winnings, leaving you taxed on... wait, you can only deduct actual losses up to that cap. The math gets complicated, but the bottom line is: profitable bettors also see higher tax bills.

Can You Avoid This?

Let's be honest about the options:

File as a Professional Gambler: Theoretically, professional gamblers can deduct gambling losses as business expenses, which might work around the 90% cap. But the IRS has strict criteria for "professional" status—you need to prove gambling is your primary income source, you keep business-like records, and you devote substantial time to it. For 99% of bettors, this isn't realistic and could trigger an audit.

Don't Itemize: If you take the standard deduction instead of itemizing, you don't get to deduct gambling losses at all—so the 90% cap is irrelevant. For many casual bettors, this is already the case. But for high-volume bettors who itemize, you're stuck with the new rules.

Reduce Volume: The simplest solution is betting less. Smaller volume means smaller phantom income. It's not exciting advice, but it's mathematically sound.

The Ohio Angle

Ohio has its own state income tax, and gambling winnings are taxable at the state level too. While Ohio's withholding rates actually dropped slightly (to 2.75% in 2026), you're still looking at both federal AND state tax on your phantom income.

The combined hit—federal plus Ohio state—means break-even bettors in higher tax brackets could see effective tax rates of 25-30% on income that never existed.

📊 Ohio-Specific Note

Ohio's gambling withholding applies to winnings over $600 where the payout is at least 300x the wager. That's unchanged. But your year-end tax liability now includes the phantom income from the 90% cap—something withholding doesn't account for.

The Bottom Line

The 2026 tax changes don't make sports betting illegal or even unprofitable. But they do add a real cost that didn't exist before. For high-volume bettors, it's a tax on action itself, not just on profits.

Here's the honest assessment:

The play? Track everything. Understand your volume. And maybe reconsider whether that extra action is worth the new tax math. Taking a break isn't just good for your bankroll—in 2026, it might be good for your tax bill too.

Track Your Bets Properly

Documentation is your only defense against the IRS. Start tracking every wager now.

Read: Bet Tracking 101